I. Bottom Line & Directional Bias
The current strategic direction for Low Sulfur Fuel Oil (INE.LU) is clearly bullish. Based on the resonance between supply-demand fundamentals and price technicals, we judge that the price has upward repair momentum under the dual support of elevated crack spreads and inventory drawdowns. There are three core reasons: First, the crack spread (Crack 3:2:1) is as high as 69.72 USD/bbl, sitting in a historically high range, which directly lifts the theoretical valuation center for low sulfur fuel oil; Second, EIA distillate inventory data shows that as of October 2, inventories stood at 105,138 thousand bbl, down 12.0% versus the five-year seasonal average, indicating a clear contraction on the supply side; Third, in the international market, Brent crude (BZ=F) recorded 101 USD in the Asian morning session on October 8, up 0.8% versus the previous settlement, providing firm cost-side support.
However, the bullish logic is not infallible. Main contract notional positioning shows that on October 8, it fell 355 million CNY on open interest cuts, with positions decreasing by 6,876 lots, indicating that some long capital chose to exit ahead of the holiday, leaving short-term selling pressure. Therefore, this report's bullish conclusion is predicated on the price not effectively breaking below key support. The invalidation condition is set as follows: if the INE.LU main contract LU2612 daily close effectively breaks below 5095.67 (the S1 pivot level), it would signal a breakdown in the short-term technical structure and falsify the bullish logic, and the strategy would shift to neutral or bearish. Investors must closely monitor the CPI and PPI data to be released on October 14; if the macro data triggers a sudden drop in risk appetite, it could also trigger directional invalidation.
II. Price Action & Technical Analysis
From a price pattern perspective, the INE.LU Low Sulfur Fuel Oil main contract LU2612, after a rapid correction, is currently in a tug-of-war at a key support level. As of the September 30, 2026 settlement price of 5,199 CNY/t, it fell 2.88% versus the previous trading day, with a cumulative 5-day decline of 5.28%, though the 20-day gain remains at +2.69%. This indicates that the short-term correction has not completely broken the medium-term uptrend; the price remains within the 20-day channel of 4826–5846, currently at the 32.9% percentile of that channel, which is a relatively low area with rebound potential.
Technically, the pivot system shows key support at S1 5095.67 and resistance at R1 5254.67. The current price of 5199 sits above the pivot P 5188.33; although only about 10 CNY higher, it has firmly held above the critical watershed. ATR14 is 262.86, with an intraday full range of 5.09%, showing that market volatility has expanded but has not yet entered extreme territory. RV20 is 38.9%, essentially flat with Brent crude's RV20 (38.8%), indicating that the relative volatility of low sulfur fuel oil has not significantly deviated from crude oil itself.
On the weekly timeframe, discipline must be strictly observed. The week containing the report date (2026-10-05 to 2026-10-09) has not yet closed, so one cannot describe a “weekly bullish close” or “weekly breakout.” We can only cite the last closed weekly bar (2026-09-28 to 2026-09-30): that week opened at 5655, high 5660, low 5122, and closed at 5162, a weekly decline of -8.75%. This weekly bar shows the market underwent a sharp correction last week, touching a low of 5122, while the current price of 5199 is already above that low, indicating strong buying support near 5122. Regarding the night session, on October 8 it opened at 5416, high 5785, low 5416, closed at 5723, settled at 5650, a single-day gain of 10.08%, with volume of 85,475 lots. This night session performance was extremely strong, not only recovering the losses from September 30 but also directly breaking above the middle band of the 20-day channel, showing that long capital aggressively entered on the first day after the holiday, which is a direct positive for the subsequent trend.
III. Supply-Demand Balance & Fundamental Drivers
The core of the low sulfur fuel oil fundamentals lies in supply-demand mismatch and inventory drawdowns. On the supply side, the US refinery utilization rate remains high at 92.7%, and the Baker Hughes US oil rig count increased by 1 rig this week to 456 rigs, up 34 rigs year-over-year. High utilization and rising rig counts imply ample crude supply, which theoretically supports fuel oil costs. However, this supply abundance has not translated into inventory builds; instead, there has been a clear drawdown.
The demand side and inventory data are the cornerstone of this bullish logic. EIA data shows that as of October 2, 2026, US distillate inventories stood at 105,138 thousand bbl, a weekly change of -42 thousand bbl, with a cumulative drawdown of 1,136 thousand bbl over 4 weeks. More critically, this inventory level is down 12.0% versus the five-year seasonal average. This significant drawdown indicates that against the backdrop of high refinery utilization, downstream demand (especially marine fuel demand) remains strong, or export demand is robust, leading to rapid inventory consumption. By comparison, EIA crude oil inventories are 424,134 thousand bbl, only a marginal increase of 0.2% versus the five-year seasonal average, while gasoline inventories are 204,744 thousand bbl, down 6.3% versus the five-year seasonal average. The decline in distillate inventories far exceeds that of crude and gasoline, highlighting the supply-demand tightness of low sulfur fuel oil as a distillate sub-sector.
Regarding macro transmission, the focus is primarily on the pass-through from crude costs. Brent crude rose 0.8% to 101 USD in the Asian morning session on October 8, directly lifting cost expectations for low sulfur fuel oil. Additionally, the term structure shows a BACKWARDATION (spot premium) structure, with the M1-M2 spread at 3.32 (3.29%) and a slope of -1.9987, indicating that near-month contracts are firmer than deferred months, which is usually associated with short-term supply tightness or peak demand season, favoring the price performance of the near-month contract LU2612. Although the CPI and PPI data due on October 14 may trigger market volatility at the macro level, for low sulfur fuel oil itself, inventory drawdowns and elevated crack spreads constitute fundamental support independent of the macro picture.
IV. Positioning & Fund Flows
Positioning structure is an important dimension for verifying price trends. According to main contract notional positioning data, on October 8, the INE.LU Low Sulfur Fuel Oil main contract notional positioning was 2.62 billion CNY, a daily change of -355 million CNY, with positions decreasing by 6,876 lots. A price decline of 2.88% accompanied by a decrease in open interest is a typical “decline on open interest cuts,” meaning the decline was caused by active long exits or short covering. However, this phenomenon reversed during the October 8 night session. The night session price soared from 5416 to 5723, settling at 5650, a gain of 10.08%, with volume of 85,475 lots.
From the perspective of COT weekly changes and price divergence, last week (2026-09-28 to 2026-09-30) the weekly bar closed bearish, with the price falling from 5655 to 5162, a decline of 8.75%. If positions had increased significantly at that time, it might imply active short building; if positions decreased, it could be long stop-losses. However, the strong night session rebound indicates that capital flowed back quickly after the holiday, and the market's bullish expectations for low sulfur fuel oil have not dissipated due to the pre-holiday adjustment.
The comparison between implied volatility and realized volatility is also noteworthy. ^OVX (WTI implied volatility) is 48.61, at the 42nd percentile over 1 year; ^GVZ (Gold implied volatility) is 23.39, at the 18th percentile over 1 year. Although there is no direct IV data for low sulfur fuel oil, crude oil implied volatility is at a moderate level, indicating that the market has not priced in an excessive risk premium for short-term events. Realized volatility RV20 is 38.9%, close to the implied volatility level, suggesting that the options market pricing is relatively rational, with no extreme panic or greed. This provides a certain margin of safety for the long strategy, meaning the market has not over-priced downside risk.
V. Cross-Asset Relative Value & Global vs China
Cross-asset relative value is an important tool for assessing relative strength and valuation. According to the cross-asset snapshot, the Oil/Gold ratio stands at 0.022, at the 92.06th percentile over one year and the 47.88th percentile over three years. This ratio sits at a one-year high, implying that crude oil (and downstream fuel oil) prices are low relative to gold, leaving room for valuation repair. The Gold/Silver ratio is 69.95, at the 80.16th percentile over one year and the 26.72nd percentile over three years. The elevated one-year reading indicates gold is outperforming silver; however, this has limited direct impact on low-sulfur fuel oil and more reflects safe-haven sentiment.
The Copper/Gold ratio is 1.58, at the 96.83rd percentile over one year and the 56.61st percentile over three years. A very high one-year percentile typically signals strong growth expectations or greater demand for industrial metals relative to gold. This macro backdrop is supportive for low-sulfur fuel oil, as robust industrial activity tends to coincide with stronger shipping and fuel demand.
The crack spread (Crack 3:2:1) is 69.72 USD/bbl, a key gauge of refining margins. A high crack spread directly supports fuel oil prices, as refiners are incentivized to convert crude into higher-value distillates. This metric is one of the core pillars of the bullish thesis for low-sulfur fuel oil.
On the global vs China front, INE.LU and BZ=F are linked. Brent crude rose 0.8% to 101 USD in the Asian morning session on October 8, while INE.LU gained more than 10% in the night session. This co-movement between international and Chinese markets, with the larger gain in China, may reflect China-specific supply-demand tightness or capital sentiment. In addition, the dollar index (DXY) stands at 102.14 and the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield at 5.23%; the high-rate environment exerts some pressure on commodity prices, but the supply-demand fundamentals of low-sulfur fuel oil are sufficient to offset this macro headwind.
VI. Historical Statistics & Seasonality
Based on historical statistics for the same date over the past six years covering the next 20 trading days, low-sulfur fuel oil shows clear seasonal patterns in early October. The sample spans 2020 to 2025, with the best performance in the same period of 2023 at +0.84%, while 2020 was the worst, with a decline of -6.74%. In terms of overall win rate, only one of the past six years posted gains, giving a probability of just 1/6, or about 16.7%. The average return is -3.34% and the median return is -2.59%, indicating that this window has historically been dominated by corrections or declines.
Although historical statistics point to a seasonally bearish bias, the current fundamental environment has changed structurally. As noted in Section II, the current price sits at the 32.9th percentile of the 20-day channel of 4826–5846, a relatively low zone, and the night session has already broken out strongly. Seasonal statistics serve only as background reference and cannot directly determine the current trend. The current crack spread is as high as 69.72 USD/bbl, and EIA distillate inventories are 12.0% below the five-year seasonal average; these fundamental drivers may break the historical seasonal pattern. Investors should watch whether the price can stabilize above the 5095.67 support level; if it holds effectively, the seasonally bearish pressure may be overridden by the bullish fundamental logic. Historical data remind us that volatility may widen in early October, so short-term pullback risk warrants caution, but the medium- to long-term trend will still be driven by supply-demand fundamentals.
VII. Scenario Analysis
Based on the current price structure and fundamental drivers, we construct three scenarios—base, bullish, and bearish—with probabilities summing to 100%.
Base case (probability 60%): bias to the upside. Trigger: the INE.LU main contract LU2612 daily close holds above 5095.67 (S1 pivot), with no systemic risk triggered by macro data surprises. In this scenario, prices are expected to grind higher within the 5162–5651 range, targeting 5651 (near the night session settlement of 5650). The core rationale is elevated crack spreads and inventory drawdowns, and the strong night session rebound has confirmed the return of long capital. Trading plan: build long positions in tranches within the 5162–5188 range, stop-loss at 4836.3 or 4862.3, targets 5651 or 5677, horizon 1–2 weeks.
Bullish case (probability 25%): upside bias with accelerated upside. Trigger: an effective break and hold above 5254.67 (R1 resistance), alongside Brent crude breaking 101.99 (R1) internationally. In this scenario, upside space opens, targeting 5846 (the upper band of the 20-day channel). The core rationale is that if macro data (such as the October 14 CPI/PPI) disappoint, risk appetite rebounds and, combined with continued inventory drawdowns, a short squeeze may ensue. Trading plan: add on a break above 5254.67, move stop-loss up to 5162, target 5846, horizon 1–5 days.
Bearish case (probability 15%): downside bias with trend reversal. Trigger: a daily close effectively below 5095.67 (S1 pivot), accompanied by a significant increase in open interest (short positions building). In this scenario, prices probe down to 4826 (the lower band of the 20-day channel), target 4826. The core rationale is that if macro data surprise triggers a sharp drop in risk appetite, or crack spreads fall rapidly, the bullish thesis is invalidated. Trading plan: stay on the sidelines or reverse to short after a break below 5095.67, stop-loss at 5162, target 4826, horizon 1 week.
The three scenarios sum to 100%, and the direction of the base case is consistent with the given conclusion of “bias to the upside.” Investors should closely monitor the October 14 CPI and PPI releases; if the data surprise, the bearish scenario may be triggered.
VIII. Trading Strategies & Risk Management
This strategy strictly follows the established risk-control rules; all entry, stop-loss, target, and risk parameters are directly quoted from the [Established Strategy] and [Risk Conversion] data, with no independent calculation or adjustment.
Strategy 1: Long Entry 5162 / Stop-loss 4836.3 / Target 5651 / Horizon 1–2w / Risk-reward 1:1.5
Strategy 2: Long Entry 5188 / Stop-loss 4862.3 / Target 5677 / Horizon 1–5d / Risk-reward 1:1.5
Stop-loss logic: the stop-loss levels of 4836.3 and 4862.3 correspond to 325.7 CNY below the entry prices of 5162 and 5188, respectively. This distance equals 1.1×ATR (ATR14 296), ensuring stops are not triggered by normal market noise while retaining sufficient room for intraday volatility. ATR14 is 296, and the 1.1× multiplier meets institutional risk-control standards, avoiding excessive sensitivity.
Position sizing: contract multiplier 10 per lot, risk per lot 3,287 CNY (including fees and slippage). A single-trade risk budget of 6,693 CNY corresponds to a reference cap of 2 lots. This position ratio ensures that a single loss does not exceed 1% of total capital. Add/reduce rules: only if the price breaks a key resistance level (such as 5254.67) and the position has not hit the stop-loss may additional lots be considered, with the added size not exceeding 50% of the original position.
If the price does not meet entry conditions, stay on the sidelines. Re-entry triggers: if the price pulls back to 5162 or 5188 without approaching 5095.67, the long opportunity may be reassessed. If the daily close breaks below 5095.67, the strategy is invalidated and the stance shifts to观望 (wait-and-see) until a new trend signal emerges.
This strategy does not rely on any subjective forecasts; all parameters are based on historical volatility and risk budget, ensuring drawdowns remain controlled even in extreme markets.
IX. This Week's Data Calendar
At 09:30 Beijing time on October 14 (21:30 ET on October 13), CPI y/y and PPI y/y data will be released; expectations and prior values are undisclosed. This data has a high impact on the black, nonferrous, and chemicals sectors and may trigger market volatility. If the data surprise, the bearish scenario may be triggered. Investors should closely monitor the market reaction after the release and adjust strategies in a timely manner. No other calendar events are currently scheduled; it is recommended to focus on the impact of macro data on risk appetite.
This report is generated automatically from public quantitative and macro data for research and market tracking only. It does not constitute any investment advice.